Stocks rebounded sharply in the first quarter as investors reacted favorably to the Federal Reserve’s change of heart on interest rates. When Fed chairman Jerome Powell said back in early January that the rate hiking cycle was over and that the Fed’s balance sheet was not going to contract any further, the market abruptly stopped pricing in recession for 2019 and instead started discounting a profit recovery later in the year. Over the years we have discussed the importance of liquidity – greater liquidity tends to be better for risk assets; this is yet another example of how a positive change in market liquidity can lead to a strong rally.
Arithmetically, last quarter’s 13.65% S&P gain does not completely erase the previous quarter’s -13.52% loss, but it sure feels a lot better. The small cap Russell 2000 gained 14.58% last quarter but is still down -8.56% over the previous two quarters combined. See Exhibit 1. That said, I don’t think anybody really hoped we could erase those steep fourth quarter losses in just three months. Markets are sometimes said to take the escalator up and the elevator down, so when stocks rise almost fast as they previously fell, that tends to be a good sign. In my experience, at least.
S&P 500 and Russell 2000, 9/30/2018 – 3/31/2019
It is also encouraging that international markets largely kept pace with the U.S. market’s advance. In fact, in local currencies many foreign markets performed better. There really wasn’t any poorly performing major foreign market last quarter, despite evidence that global growth was slowing. According to Barrons, world equity funds were up 11.64% (in dollar terms) last quarter. China led the way, while India and Latin America were among the bottom performers. Despite the fiasco that is Brexit, European stocks rose 10.38%.
It was also a good quarter for bonds. Falling inflation and a more friendly Fed created a favorable environment for every area of the bond market. High yield bonds performed the best with a gain of over seven percent, but even short-term treasuries, the least volatile bond category, gained 1%. That is an unusually good return for one quarter, considering bonds have averaged 2.74% per year over the last five years.
We didn’t over-react to stock market weakness during the fourth quarter of 2018, and as such were not in the position of being forced to buy back into the market at higher prices during the first quarter (not that we didn’t add a little here and there). There were a few moves to be made at the beginning of the year in foreign stocks (which we had trimmed late in 2018). We also increased our exposure to international bonds more recently once the U.S. Fed signaled an end to the interest rate tightening cycle. That takes the pressure off foreign central banks, making it easier for them to cut rates in response to the weakness in their economies without worrying about currency depreciation (and capital flight).
Going forward, we are looking for a catalyst to break out to highs above those we saw in September and January of 2018 (approximately 2935 on the S&P 500). Investors are hoping that a comprehensive trade deal between the U.S. and China will be that catalyst, but the market may well view the trade deal to be a “buy-the-rumor, sell-the-news” event absent meaningful and enforceable intellectual property guarantees. Good luck on that! In the meantime, I believe the U.S. stock market will eventually challenge the old highs on lack of bad news more than anything else. Stocks are still expensive on a price to sales and price to cash flow basis, but decent investor demand combined with corporate stock buybacks continues to provide a tailwind. The concern I have is that the November through April time period is traditionally more favorable for stocks than the May through October period, so a failure to make new highs by Memorial Day (should that occur) may cause market psychology to deteriorate. That said, if Fed policy remains easy, market liquidity is plentiful, and signs of imminent recession are scarce, we will probably not get defensive in any major way.
Commentary – It IS Different This Time
Editor’s Note: This commentary takes inspiration from Ben Hunt’s April 17th issue of Epsilon Theory, titled “This is Water”
Quite a while ago I wrote a Commentary entitled It’s Not Different This Time. My thesis was that although technology stocks were behaving as if we had entered a new era in which profitability did not matter, eventually companies that don’t generate net profits don’t survive. The idea of the title came for one of my mentors, who very early in my career told me to be extremely careful every time I heard the words ‘It’s different this time”, because it’s never different this time. His point was that we are in a perpetual market cycle of recovery-optimism-euphoria-anxiety-panic-capitulation-recovery. The details change from cycle to cycle but those human emotions don’t. Insofar as the discussion relates to investor behavior, he was absolutely right, of course. That said, there is another way to look at market cycles of the past and to conclude that it is, in fact, quite different this time.
Ben Hunt’s article, which everyone should read, makes the point that capitalism works because of its dynamism. A company or an industry thrives because underlying conditions turn favorable or because it creates those conditions. Those industries or companies are therefore able to generate higher profit margins. New companies then enter that space to try to capture a share of the higher profits. Also, employees of the higher earning company want to be paid more as a result of the higher profits they are helping to generate. Eventually these and other factors combine to push margins back down. Reversion to the mean also works in the opposite direction. Poor financial results in an industry drive firms out of business and wages down, such that surviving firms have an improved competitive landscape. Hunt goes on to state that if economic dynamism is lost due to “financialization”, or the ability to generate higher profitability without having to sell more products or services, it isn’t really capitalism any more. He cites dramatically reduced corporate tax rates and super low interest rates as factors that have allowed corporate management to say to employees essentially “you are not the reason for our excess profits, so we are not sharing them with you. We are reserving them for shareholders and for ourselves, as we have been smart enough to leverage these low interest rates and buy the right politicians”.
So here we are. In an environment of low inflation, low productivity, and low growth. Where running large deficits does not lead to spiraling inflation. Where the Federal Reserve can essentially keep the business cycle out of recession almost indefinitely by expanding credit. And where a few investors have said to me lately (more or less), “if this is all true, why not turn the “risk knob” up to 11”?
Fair question. I guess the best explanation is that my investing career began in 1986. I remember October 19, 1987, when stock dropped -22.3% IN ONE DAY. I learned a strategy (in that case it was called portfolio insurance) that involves selling when the market drops a certain percent may work for a small group of people, but if EVERYBODY adopts the very same strategy it will not work for ANYBODY. I learned on August 2nd, 1990 when Iraq invaded Kuwait that you can focus on a myriad of geopolitical hot spots and still fail to forecast the one that blows up in your face. I remember in 1998 how the smartest financial minds in academia made more than four billion dollars disappear in the Long Term Capital Management fiasco. From that I learned that just because you create a model that says a certain event should occur no more frequently than once in 10,000 years doesn’t mean that it won’t happen (or that your model is correct). From the late 1990s tech wreck I learned that if the markets reward revenues instead of profits, eventually people will sell dollar bills for 99 cents. From the financial crisis of the 2000s I learned that just because a particular aggregate price had never declined before (in this case housing) doesn’t mean it never could. We all also learned from Chuck Prince of Citigroup that Wall Street firms will do things they know are stupid as long as everybody else is doing them.
The point of all this is to say that every time the market has indulged in behavior that suggests it believes it has found the key to perpetual prosperity there has eventually been a train wreck. We just had a -19% stock market correction because the Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate to 2.5%! Forty years ago it took double digit interest rates to cause this big of a decline. In 1987 an increase to 7.25% on September 22 helped precipitate the crash. In 2000 rates peaked at 6.5% in May. In 2007 interest rates only needed get to 5.25% to burst the housing bubble. It appears that interest rates have to keep falling or we cannot sustain the bull market. Obviously, there is a wall out there that we will eventually hit since there is a lower limit to interest rates (such that easing won’t work anymore). Japan found that level, and Europe seems to have as well.
What I hope you take from all of this is that we recognize that the dominant paradigm has shifted. The 3-5 year business cycle of thirty years ago is a thing of the past. The belief that a bull market must end because a certain amount of time has passed has proven unfounded. Today investors and the Fed no longer fear inflation, corporate America no longer fears debt and in fact believes leverage and low taxes solve everything. All that said, human nature has not changed. Losses lead to prudent behavior which lead to gains which lead to increasingly reckless behavior which eventually lead to spectacular busts. We are committed to investing in a globally diversified portfolio of stocks and bonds which we believe will help cushion portfolios during a major downturn. When you have short business cycles as we did in the 1980s and 1990s the rewards for avoiding the busts arrive regularly. When cycles stretch for a decade or more as they do now, those rewards are much less apparent. Having experienced what I have over thirty plus years, I have a certain respect for risk because I know how quickly large gains can turn to losses. What global central banks have been doing is a great experiment. There is no historical precedent for this much corporate and government debt. I hope this works out well for all of us but I have my doubts. And because of that, I’m going to err on the side of caution.
 S&P 500 and Russell 2000 performance are per Morningstar Workstation
 You would still have a -1.72% loss
 Barrons Quarterly Issue, 4/8/19
 BBgBarc US Corporate High Yield, per Morningstar
 BBgBarc 1-3 Yr US Treasury, per Morningstar
 BBgBarc Aggregate Bond, per Morningstar
 Kimberly Amadeo, Fed Funds Rate History with Its Highs, Lows, and Chart, thebalance.com 03/21/2019
 Because the unavoidable byproduct of financialization is economic inequality, and this is leading to political instability across the developed world.
Past performance is no assurance of future results. Trademark Financial Management, LLC (“Trademark”) is a registered investment adviser with its principal place of business in the State of Minnesota. Trademark and its representatives are in compliance with registration requirements imposed upon investment advisers by those states in which Trademark operates. Trademark may only transact business in those states in which it is registered or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration. This newsletter is limited to the dissemination of general information pertaining to its investment advisory/management services. Any subsequent, direct communication by Trademark with a prospective client shall be conducted by a representative that is either registered or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration in the state where the prospective client resides. A complete list of all recommendations will be provided if requested for the preceding period of not less than one year. It should not be assumed that recommendations made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of the securities in this list. Opinions expressed are those of Trademark Financial Management and are subject to change, not guaranteed and should not be considered recommendations to buy or sell any security. For information pertaining to the registration status of Trademark please contact Trademark at (952) 358-3395 or refer to the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure web site (www.adviserinfo.sec.gov). For additional information about Trademark, including fees and services, send for our disclosure statement as set forth on Form ADV from us using the contact information herein or by calling 952-358-3395. Please read the disclosure statement carefully before you invest or send money. Any reference to a chart, graph, formula, or software as a source of analysis used by Trademark Financial Management staff is one of many factors used to make investment decisions for your portfolio. No one graph, chart, formula, or software can in and of itself be used to determine which securities to buy or sell, when to buy or sell them, or assist any person in making decisions as to which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. Any chart, graph, formula, or software used is limited by the data entered and the created parameters. The data was obtained from third parties deemed by the adviser to be reliable. Nonetheless, the adviser has not verified the results and cannot be assured of their accuracy.
Annual ADV Notification
As a registered investment adviser, we provide certain important information to you on an annual basis, which is included in this Annual Notice. Our most recent disclosure statement as set forth on Form ADV Part 2 and 2b is now available. There have been no material changes since the February 28, 2018 Form ADV Part 2 brochure. If you need a copy at any time throughout our relationship, please call us toll free at 952-358-3395 or 866-944-0039 or send an email to email@example.com. A copy is also available at our website, www.trademarkfinancial.us. Additional information regarding our firm is also available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. You should always contact the financial advisor listed on this quarterly statement immediately if there are any changes in your financial situation, investment objectives, email address, or if you wish to add or modify any reasonable restrictions to the management of your account. As always, should you have any questions or require any additional information regarding this Annual Notice, please do not hesitate to contact us.