top of page

What Worked for October 2015

Here’s a look at trends in October: High quality companies performed much better than lower quality companies.

  1. Why? Lower qualities companies had a sharp rally in late September after the Fed held rates unchanged, but quality re-asserted itself firmly by the third week of October. Lower quality bonds outperformed investment grade bonds this month.

  2. Why? Junk bond spreads peaked on October 2nd and contracted steadily throughout the month. Capitalization-weighted indices beat equal-weighted indices with the same objective once again.

  3. Why? The trend towards large companies continues as larger companies typically have stronger balance sheets, allowing them to more effectively use leverage. Asia outperformed Europe again, but both indices gained over 8%

  4. Why? More re-assuring news from China, more stimulus from the European Central Bank. Frontier markets lagged emerging markets for the first time in several months.

  5. Why? Both gained, but neither rose nearly as much as developed markets. Hedged foreign funds beat un-hedged foreign funds

  6. Why? The currency markets were volatile in October with the dollar losing ground after the weak U.S. employment report, then gaining strength on Draghi’s extension of QE in Europe and the Fed’s hawkish comments last week. Small cap companies edged out mid-size companies in performance, but the difference was small. As one might expect from a market up almost 9%, “risk on” industries materials, energy, and technology foremost crushed risk off industries. Growth modestly outperformed value for the first time in three months. It appears as though the growth trend remains in place. The trend continues. The stock market failed to make new lows in September, signaling a possible bullish trend change.  That change appears to have been confirmed in October as S&P 500 came very close to its all-time highs on Wednesday the 28th. (See Chart 1) The NASDAQ came even closer.  (As of today, 11/2 the indices are again testing their all-time highs.)  Price and breadth action argues for the market to go higher in the short term. Chart 1

Source: How do we interpret this? If stocks would have gone on in September or October to fall below their August lows, it would have been a strong signal to us that the primary trend was bearish and that a more defensive posture was prudent.  Obviously, that didn’t happen.  We have experienced a nice recovery in October to the point that we are 2-3% from all-time highs.  That puts us back where we were in July: a long-in-the-tooth bull market with fairly expensive valuations, interest rates that are likely to begin moving higher in the next couple of months and corporate profit margins showing signs of coming down from record levels.   Many investment professionals wanted the market to retreat this past summer because we were uncomfortable investing new money at such lofty valuation levels.  For better or worse, it is Groundhogs Day all over again. I believe that a fair number of the pundits who keep arguing for the Fed to raise rates are thinking the same way, namely that we need to start having business cycles again.  Yes, that would mean a more pronounced sell-off at some point, but it also means that rather than perpetual slow growth such that businesses fear to invest for the future, we would see both recessions and booms.  Booms are essential for the success of deep cyclical industries like engineering, construction, and mining because it takes time for capital spending in these areas to pay off. As I said, the bull market seems to have re-exerted itself.  Best then to continue to play the current trend, investing in industries where the return on a dollar invested in the business is fairly immediate.  That means consumer-oriented firms, technology firms, and those companies with the balance sheet flexibility to borrow at low rates to buy back enough stock to improve per share comparisons.

Past performance is no assurance of future results. Trademark Financial Management, LLC (“Trademark”) is a registered investment adviser with its principal place of business in the State of Minnesota. Trademark and its representatives are in compliance with registration requirements imposed upon investment advisers by those states in which Trademark operates. Trademark may only transact business in those states in which it is registered or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration. This newsletter is limited to the dissemination of general information pertaining to its investment advisory/management services. Any subsequent, direct communication by Trademark with a prospective client shall be conducted by a representative that is either registered or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration in the state where the prospective client resides. A complete list of all recommendations will be provided if requested for the preceding period of not less than one year.   It should not be assumed that recommendations made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of the securities in this list.  Opinions expressed are those of Trademark Financial Management and are subject to change, not guaranteed and should not be considered recommendations to buy or sell any security. For information pertaining to the registration status of Trademark please contact Trademark at (952) 358-3395 or refer to the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure web site ( For additional information about Trademark, including fees and services, send for our disclosure statement as set forth on Form ADV from us using the contact information herein or by calling 952-358-3395. Please read the disclosure statement carefully before you invest or send money. Any reference to a chart, graph, formula, or software as a source of analysis used by Trademark Financial Management staff is one of many factors used to make investment decisions for your portfolio.  No one graph, chart, formula, or software can in and of itself be used to determine which securities to buy or sell, when to buy or sell them, or assist any person in making decisions as to which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them.  Any chart, graph, formula, or software used is limited by the data entered and the created parameters. The data was obtained from third parties deemed by the adviser to be reliable. Nonetheless, the adviser has not verified the results and cannot be assured of their accuracy. 

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

What Worked for September 2015

Here’s a look at trends in September: Quality, large cap companies performed better than market as a whole, and dramatically better than companies with weak fundamentals.<1> Why? “Risk-off” securitie

What's Worked for July 2015

Just a note on what worked and what didn’t in July, because August looks like more of the same. Quality, large cap companies performed well; leveraged firms did not. Why? As economic fears resurfa


bottom of page